Wait, now that I think about it, maybe Fantasia 2000 had a worser animation quality than The Little Mermaid...
Useless bit of trivia: I remembered that, when I was very young and when I saw The Little Mermaid, I wondered why Ariel couldn't just take her fins off to reveal her legs (much like those dolls based off of her). This befuddled me for the longest time, until about five years later (when I was about 7-10), someone told me that there'd be bones under her fins like fish skeleton.
Wait... Capcom!?
- Cuckooguy
- LEGEND
- Posts: 761
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 12:27 am
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
- Zeta
- Posts: 4444
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 11:06 am
- Contact:
Most of it. Total letdown. Most of the music was unidentifiable and absolutely boring.Speaking of bad sequels, who here hated Fantasia 2000?
The sequence with the flying whales was absolute shitte. So was Rhaspody in Blue. Which was not only disgustingly long, had ridiculous characters (I'm looking at you - stereotypical lazy black musician), but the music absolutely sucked donkey balls.Wait, now that I think about it, maybe Fantasia 2000 had a worser animation quality than The Little Mermaid...
The Steadfast Soldier was very good. The opening sequence set to Bhetoven's 5th was nice. The Firebird Suite was great.
The rest of the stuff was worthless. Noah's Ark? Flamingos with yoyos? What the fuck?
And those ugly as fuck flying whales. They looked so unnatural. A PSX could've done better animation. And that goddamn cutesy baby whale. I wanted him to be eaten by some Japanese people.
- Green Gibbon!
- BUTT CHEESE
- Posts: 4648
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:39 am
- Location: A far eastern land across the sea
- Contact:
- j-man
- All-Time Everything GHZ Award Winner
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:07 pm
- Location: Entirely Unmoving
- Contact:
- Brazillian Cara
- Posts: 1729
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:30 pm
- Location: On a never-ending quest to change my avatar.
