Sahara: i/10 because it's imaginary.

Speak your mind, or lack thereof. There may occasionally be on-topic discussions.
Post Reply
User avatar
chriscaffee
Posts: 2021
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 12:43 am

Sahara: i/10 because it's imaginary.

Post by chriscaffee »

Evidently it's opening night for Sahara so my suitmate and his high school friend decided to go see it and I tagged along for lack of any other plans this evening. I didn't know what to expect since the first I heard of it was 12:30 am this morning.

Basically it's about these ex-Navy Seals turned treasure hunters that go after this treasure while trying to stop an evil plot James Bond style. Each solution these guys come up with become more ludicrous than the previous and it all culminates in a played out climax that I predicted to the very camera angle.

The jokes weren't funny. The action wasn't exciting. The characters were cardboard standees. Mathew's characater is evidently some sort of sociopath who is completely disconnected from reality because he seems to show no real emotion whatsoever. Your generic action hero might get pissed off at the bad guys. He might be horrified by the death all around him. Hell, he might even throw out horrible one liners. Mathew just sort of grins.

The six-fifty was worth it just to get out of the dorms, but the movie sucked. I almost suggested Sin City instead, since it had been out a week, but I had no real interest to see that so whatever.
Last edited by chriscaffee on Fri Apr 08, 2005 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

plasticwingsband
ASSMAN
Posts: 1340
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 6:53 pm
Location: Buttse.cx!
Contact:

Re: Sahara: i/10 because it's irrational.

Post by plasticwingsband »

chriscaffee wrote:I almost suggested Sin City instead, since it had been out a week, but I had no real interest to see that so whatever.
You should have seen Sin City.

User avatar
Segaholic2
Forum God
Posts: 3516
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:28 am
Now Playing: Your mom

Post by Segaholic2 »

I've not even heard of this movie.

And yes, you should have seen Sin City instead.

User avatar
Delphine
Horrid, Pmpous Wench
Posts: 4720
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:05 pm
Now Playing: DOVAHKIIN
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by Delphine »

Damnit, I still need to see Sin City. I hate not having enough free time.

User avatar
Segaholic2
Forum God
Posts: 3516
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:28 am
Now Playing: Your mom

Post by Segaholic2 »

I've seen it <I>twice</I>. Del, you're a <B>failure</B>.

User avatar
Grant
Posts: 1491
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 6:05 pm

Post by Grant »

I'm going to go see it for a second time tomorrow night, this time with male buddies, so I'm looking forward to it.

User avatar
Dunjohn
Posts: 262
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 2:32 pm
Location: Ireland. The sleeker, better Britain.

Post by Dunjohn »

I have too much free time. I just never go to the cinema. Sin City sounds good, but I'm kidding myself if I say I'll go see it. 'Cuz I know I just won't.

I'm not even sure why I'm posting this. Maybe to annoy Delphine. Or maybe just because I have too much free time.

User avatar
The Doc
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 11:04 am
Now Playing: Guess Who?
Location: The Corner of No and Where.
Contact:

Post by The Doc »

So, basically what you're saying is, it's National Treasure, only even crappier?

User avatar
chriscaffee
Posts: 2021
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 12:43 am

Post by chriscaffee »

I haven't seen National Treasure, but I'll agree with you anyway.

User avatar
Baba O'Reily
ABBA BANNED
Posts: 3339
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:26 pm
Location: http://zenixstudios.com/files/ 554SpaceIsThePlace.Mp3
Contact:

Post by Baba O'Reily »

Go see Sin City. Now.

User avatar
The Doc
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 11:04 am
Now Playing: Guess Who?
Location: The Corner of No and Where.
Contact:

Post by The Doc »

No.

Post Reply