So, you're a Tails fan?

Speak your mind, or lack thereof. There may occasionally be on-topic discussions.
User avatar
Green Gibbon!
BUTT CHEESE
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:39 am
Now Playing: Bit Trip Complete
Location: A far eastern land across the sea
Contact:

Post by Green Gibbon! »

Clean underwear is important people, don't you ever listen to the matriarchal figures in you life anymore?
They're the ones who are supposed to be washing the underwear!

User avatar
Spazz
Posts: 1953
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 1:12 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA
Contact:

Post by Spazz »

Now <i>this</i> is the best thread ever!

User avatar
-wyvern
Posts: 355
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 5:55 pm
Location: England

Post by -wyvern »

Hmm. A thread that somehow combines both tails and underwear. Sorry, I just can't see whats so great about it, unless we end up with a flame war between mature matriachal ladies and sniggering teenage boys. But then it would only be great because boys outnumber girls and thus we would win.

</gross sarcasm>
I'm a fan of Tails (not the nutless wonder who does his voice over or his current character direction), but that forum is ridiculous.
Anyhow, I think tails is probably my favourite character too. He shares my unique brand of super intelligent gormlessness, although my sister likes knuckles. I'll never understand why.

I think it's likely half the people on that forum are trolls, and the other half are eight year old girls.

User avatar
Delphine
Horrid, Pmpous Wench
Posts: 4720
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:05 pm
Now Playing: DOVAHKIIN
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by Delphine »

Green Gibbon! wrote:
Clean underwear is important people, don't you ever listen to the matriarchal figures in you life anymore?
They're the ones who are supposed to be washing the underwear!
Gibbon, if you think <i>any</i> woman is going to wash your nasty 4-day old crotchwear, you've got another thing coming.

User avatar
Zeta
Posts: 4444
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 11:06 am
Contact:

Post by Zeta »

Tails actually doesn't get as much credit as he deserves. He really was the Sonic franchise's first supporting character. And he's not too bad considering he came first. Most people do overlook him in favor of Knuckles, but Tails adequately fills the roll of sidekick - and better than some characters I could name. And he does it without drawing attention away from the main character, like a lot of videogame sidekicks (Daxter, Kazooie, flesh-eating zombies).

Thanks to this topic, I have decided that Tails needs to wear underwear.

Speaking of which, where do Sonic, Tails, and Knuckles keep those rings and Chaos Emeralds? The standard joke for that sort of thing is that the character shoves it up their ass or into some other oriface, but that doesn't really work here because Rings and Chaos Emeralds are so LARGE.

On another tangent, I wear briefs, because I don't like my goods flopping around in mid-air.

Also, please remember to change your underwear once a day. And always wear your sunscreen.

User avatar
Segaholic2
Forum God
Posts: 3516
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:28 am
Now Playing: Your mom

Post by Segaholic2 »

Sunscreen is for sissies.

And why can't they store large items in their orifices? Larger items just need a larger hole.

User avatar
Popcorn
The Peanut Gallery
Posts: 1669
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:25 pm
Location: UK

Post by Popcorn »

Would anyone like to make a joke about my mother?

User avatar
Light Speed
Sexified
Posts: 2529
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 4:08 pm
Location: Park City, Utah
Contact:

Post by Light Speed »

Your mom is fat!

User avatar
Bo
Drano Master
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: Missouri
Contact:

Post by Bo »

In the SatAM cartoon, Sonic just carried around a ring, but rings were really rare items in that. I think the Archie comic issue where Sonic gets his billionth ring (#35?) had a pretty good explanation, in that he absorbs their energy (or whatever), and when he gets hit by a badnik, the energy is released and the rings re-form and scatter.
Where does Mario keep his coins, though? Wasn't that a riddle in the Super Mario Bros. 1 manual?

User avatar
Spazz
Posts: 1953
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 1:12 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA
Contact:

Post by Spazz »

Oh! I actually talked to Mario! I asked him where he puts all those coins, he said in his wallet. I asked him where he keeps his wallet, he said in his stomach. It was cool because he was in his Rock n' Roll outfit!

User avatar
Ngangbius
Posts: 2061
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 2:06 am
Now Playing: Dragon Quest IX
Location: Cleveland, OH

Post by Ngangbius »

Segaholic2 wrote:And why can't they store large items in their orifices? Larger items just need a larger hole.
So what is the maximum diameter of a hedgehog's asshole?

User avatar
Spazz
Posts: 1953
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 1:12 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA
Contact:

Post by Spazz »

Can hedgehogs stuff things in there cheeks like hamsters and other rodents?

User avatar
-wyvern
Posts: 355
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 5:55 pm
Location: England

Post by -wyvern »

Wherever they go it's not up his ass. I mean, picture the mechanics of it - I'd like to see you try to run at supersonic speed with two hundred odd rings of metal the size of your head shoved up your rectal canal.

Seriously, I genuinely would.

I prefer the "rings are positive energy as matter" explaination. It involves quantum physics, and I like those so I can frighten drunken girls by telling them that if someone doesn't see them they don't exist.

User avatar
Zeta
Posts: 4444
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 11:06 am
Contact:

Post by Zeta »


Oh! I actually talked to Mario! I asked him where he puts all those coins, he said in his wallet. I asked him where he keeps his wallet, he said in his stomach. It was cool because he was in his Rock n' Roll outfit!
You're getting Mario mixed up with Tomba! Seriously, that was a game a bout a pink-haired caveman in nothing but a grass skirt who ran around fucking pigs.

Really.

And he did keep his inventory in his pants.

As for Mario, I just assume he has really big pockets in his trousers.

User avatar
Green Gibbon!
BUTT CHEESE
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:39 am
Now Playing: Bit Trip Complete
Location: A far eastern land across the sea
Contact:

Post by Green Gibbon! »

Gibbon, if you think any woman is going to wash your nasty 4-day old crotchwear, you've got another thing coming.
My woman will wash what I tell her to wash. If she argues I'll cut off her allowance.

User avatar
Zeta
Posts: 4444
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 11:06 am
Contact:

Post by Zeta »

Green Gibbon! wrote:
Gibbon, if you think any woman is going to wash your nasty 4-day old crotchwear, you've got another thing coming.
My woman will wash what I tell her to wash. If she argues I'll cut off her allowance.
With that kind of attitude, don't be shocked if your woman cuts off something of yours . . .

User avatar
J.C.14
Douche Bag
Douche Bag
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California
Contact:

Post by J.C.14 »

Zeta wrote:With that kind of attitude, don't be shocked if your woman cuts off something of yours . . .
Oh, You mean his foot...

:shock: Wait, you don't mean his foot...ah, well...send it to my sister and she'll think it's a fish...crotchfish

User avatar
j-man
All-Time Everything GHZ Award Winner
Posts: 3227
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:07 pm
Now Playing: Sea of Friends
Location: Entirely Unmoving
Contact:

Post by j-man »

I've met many girls with nastier "crotchwear" than I, and that's clean on. My undergarments are a bed of roses by comparison even after 4 days of laziness (a rare occurrence, I treat my groin with respect by changing underoos every morning). I prefer the loose, all-cotton plaid boxer myself.

User avatar
Green Gibbon!
BUTT CHEESE
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:39 am
Now Playing: Bit Trip Complete
Location: A far eastern land across the sea
Contact:

Post by Green Gibbon! »

With that kind of attitude, don't be shocked if your woman cuts off something of yours . . .
That's an impossibility. For one thing, it's way too thick to be cut with any earthly materials. Secondly, she wouldn't even think about cutting it off because it means she'd never be able to use it again. It will be like a god to her.

My dong is the key to world-domination.

User avatar
Swift the Hedgehog
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 3:50 pm
Contact:

Post by Swift the Hedgehog »

Ahem. Back on the subject of Tails.

That link is pathetic, and that forum is idiotic. SomethingAwful constantly bashes Sonic. I like Tails, but not as much as that forum does. :confused:

User avatar
Grant
Posts: 1491
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 6:05 pm

Post by Grant »

I think the general feeling among the Something Awful writers and forum-goers isn't that they dislike Sonic or are necessairly "bashing" him; rather, it's the current direction of the series. I think you could say the same for many here.

Personally, I can't think of a Sonic game that's knocked my socks off since Sonic Adventure. I think that's mainly 'cause at the time I was like, "omg!!! 3-D Sonic!!!" because the game hasn't aged very well. The big four are the only ones I can truly call great games.

User avatar
aso
Posts: 678
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 12:18 am

Post by aso »

Here's an exact quote, from the top of their Weekend Web article there...
The Tails Board is dedicated to Miles "Tails" Prower from the Sonic the Hedgehog games, a series which should have been laid to rest roughly eight years ago.
From what I've gleaned of their comments on Sonic, they thought that the main Genesis games (1, 2, 3, & Knuckles) were fine. Everything beyond that was, well, not as good. Actually a reasonable attitude.

And I haven't found a Sonic game I've really hated yet (beyond Sonic 2 for GG). Then again, I haven't played all of Sonic Heroes yet...

User avatar
Light Speed
Sexified
Posts: 2529
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 4:08 pm
Location: Park City, Utah
Contact:

Post by Light Speed »

The more I think about it the more it seems like we are the only ones that really liked Sonic Adventure. Is it really a horrible game and we are just blinded by fanboyism? I still think it is great, decent storyline, Sonic's gameplay kicks ass, etc. Yet whenever I ask most Non-Sonic obsessors they seem to think it sucks. Hrm... are we really that biased?

User avatar
Green Gibbon!
BUTT CHEESE
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:39 am
Now Playing: Bit Trip Complete
Location: A far eastern land across the sea
Contact:

Post by Green Gibbon! »

The main problem with Sonic Adventure was that it was incomplete. There was alot of "wow" factor involved at the time, and I think everyone assumed it could only improve in future installments. Unfortunately, it gets worse and worse, and it's true to say that even the original SA hasn't aged well at all.

It still deserves alot of credit for effort. It couldn't have been easy to bring a game like Sonic into 3D, and they had some clever, creative ideas. Unfortunately, they didn't germinate enough, and now they're building the new games around the worst ideas from the previous ones.


Although, why does anyone give a fuck what Something Awful thinks in the first place? Are their opinions more viable because they're published?

User avatar
Esrever
Drano Master
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 2:26 am
Contact:

Post by Esrever »

Yes!

Sonic Adventure DX is probably the greatest tragedy in the history of the hedgehog. The original sufferred from a spazzy camera, severe collission detection bugs, a lousy framerate, short draw distance, and poorly paced and acted cut scenes. But in my opinion, it still had a rock solid core of cool levels and enjoyable gameplay. Sonic was the focus, while all of the secondary characters were amusing diversions with games that were appropriately shorter and secondary to Sonic's. The bosses were cool. The level design was solid, albiet a bit too linear. The story was great... it just could have been presented better. All of the right ingredients were there.

If any game in the Sonic series was screaming out to have a real "deluxe" treatment, one akin to Silicon Knights rehash of MGS, it was Sonic Adventure. Because, in my opinion, if those aforementioned technical weaknesses were eliminated, we would have a true platforming classic on our hands -- one I wouldn't be embarassed to speak of in the same sentence as Mario 64 and Rayman 2.

But you all know what we got instead. Sad, really.

Post Reply