Toy Story 3: Woody packs a GUN!!

Speak your mind, or lack thereof. There may occasionally be on-topic discussions.
User avatar
Grant
Posts: 1491
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 6:05 pm

Toy Story 3: Woody packs a GUN!!

Post by Grant »

In case anyone was still holding out any hope for the Pixar-less Toy Story 3 project, here's some news that might make you think twice. The director was just announced today, apparently.
Bradley Raymond will direct Toy Story 3, which Walt Disney Pictures is planning for a 2008 theatrical release. Raymond previously helmed direct-to-DVD/video Disney titles The Lion King 1½ and The Hunchback of Notre Dame II.

Disney Feature Animation is making the third film without Pixar and basing the next installment on a script by young writer Jared Stern. Stern developed a story idea for the long-in-the-works "TS3" on spec while a member of Disney's Feature Animation Writing Program.

Stern's new take is expected to advance the "Toy Story" franchise by taking the characters on the road and out of Andy's room. Stern is also understood to have invented a couple of new characters for the next installment.
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/topnews.php?id=8742

User avatar
Green Gibbon!
BUTT CHEESE
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:39 am
Now Playing: Bit Trip Complete
Location: A far eastern land across the sea
Contact:

Post by Green Gibbon! »

Was it The Incredibles that was Pixar's last project with Disney, or is it going to be that car movie?

User avatar
Grant
Posts: 1491
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 6:05 pm

Post by Grant »

The car one is their last collaboration.

User avatar
Delphine
Horrid, Pmpous Wench
Posts: 4720
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:05 pm
Now Playing: DOVAHKIIN
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Re: Toy Story 3: Woody packs a GUN!!

Post by Delphine »

Raymond previously helmed direct-to-DVD/video Disney titles The Lion King 1½ and The Hunchback of Notre Dame II.
Oh, fantastic.

User avatar
Double-S-
News Guy
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Texas

Post by Double-S- »

My childhood is being raped every week.

User avatar
Locit
News Guy
Posts: 2560
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Now Playing: Breath of Fire IV
Location: Living that enby life

Post by Locit »

I never like it when a news story refers to a series of movies as a franchise. It's almost as if they think of Toy Story as a way to get giant gobs of money as opposed to genuinely entertaining people. Almost.

User avatar
Timestones
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 11:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Toy Story 3: Woody packs a GUN!!

Post by Timestones »

Amazing Grant wrote:In case anyone was still holding out any hope for the Pixar-less Toy Story 3 project, here's some news that might make you think twice. The director was just announced today, apparently.

[snip]

Stern's new take is expected to advance the "Toy Story" franchise by taking the characters on the road and out of Andy's room. Stern is also understood to have invented a couple of new characters for the next installment.
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/topnews.php?id=8742
So in other words, Toy Story 3 will be. . . Toy Story 2?

User avatar
SuperKnux
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 12:32 pm
Location: Texas (Yeah, I know..)
Contact:

Post by SuperKnux »

Double-S- wrote:My childhood is being raped every week.
I love this quote. I've never heard anybody say it so honestly and straight to the point. I totally agree with you S.

User avatar
Grant
Posts: 1491
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 6:05 pm

Re: Toy Story 3: Woody packs a GUN!!

Post by Grant »

Timestones wrote: So in other words, Toy Story 3 will be. . . Toy Story 2?
I was also confused by the "We're taking the toys out of Andy's room this time!" thing, as if it were novel or something, considering that that had been the plot of the previous two films.

User avatar
j-man
All-Time Everything GHZ Award Winner
Posts: 3227
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:07 pm
Now Playing: Sea of Friends
Location: Entirely Unmoving
Contact:

Post by j-man »

lol but this time they go xxtreme sk8bording!!!!11

User avatar
Light Speed
Sexified
Posts: 2529
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 4:08 pm
Location: Park City, Utah
Contact:

Post by Light Speed »

Is it going to be going to be drawn or 3D?

User avatar
EmeraldGuardian
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 2:57 pm

Post by EmeraldGuardian »

Disney's goin down the drain nowadays...only thing it has for us today is Kingdom Hearts, and that was mostly Squaresoft. Most of Disney is a bunch of fags who think traditional animation is "obsolete." Though I'm somewhat interested in this new Toy Story.

User avatar
Segaholic2
Forum God
Posts: 3516
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:28 am
Now Playing: Your mom

Post by Segaholic2 »

Disney dissolved their traditional animation department. Idiots. Disney is dead to me.

User avatar
Green Gibbon!
BUTT CHEESE
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:39 am
Now Playing: Bit Trip Complete
Location: A far eastern land across the sea
Contact:

Post by Green Gibbon! »

Did they make anything worth watching after the Lion King, anyway?

User avatar
Segaholic2
Forum God
Posts: 3516
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:28 am
Now Playing: Your mom

Post by Segaholic2 »

Not really. Lilo and Stitch, maybe. Everything else, no.

Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, and The Lion King. It's incredibly sad to see what they are now.

User avatar
Dark Crow
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:28 am

Post by Dark Crow »

Not even the Emperor's New Groove? I reckon that was Disney's last great animated movie.

User avatar
Double-S-
News Guy
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Texas

Post by Double-S- »

It was funny, but hardly a classic.

User avatar
Dark Crow
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:28 am

Post by Dark Crow »

It was worth a watch, at the very least.

Without Pixar now-a-days, Disney would be absolutely nothing. I reckon that this Toy Story 3 is going to be pretty mediocre, because with that Dinosaurs movie, Disney have proved that they have absolutely no creative abilities whatsoever by themselves.

User avatar
Locit
News Guy
Posts: 2560
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Now Playing: Breath of Fire IV
Location: Living that enby life

Post by Locit »

I rather liked Emperor's New Groove.

Also, is anything from our collective childhoods not going to be raped and/or destroyed?

User avatar
Zeta
Posts: 4444
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 11:06 am
Contact:

Post by Zeta »

Mario's still safe.

*knocks on wood*

User avatar
Dark Crow
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:28 am

Post by Dark Crow »

Are you sure about that Zeta?

Image

User avatar
Esrever
Drano Master
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 2:26 am
Contact:

Post by Esrever »

I think the problem is just that the Disney template is tired. Their formula is so predictable that after awhile you don't even need to watch their films in the first place. Every time they try to make a new "classic" it just feels like another rehash.

Both the Emperor's New Groove and Home on the Range were quite good, but they were disposable, not classics. They didn't even try to be. Both of those films originally began as more standard "classic" Disney template fare. They were chopped up and retooled as buddy comedies because they were not shaping up appropriately. In other words, before the retools those two films were going to be even shittier than the shitty template movies Disney actually finished. And they did so much work on them before finally abandonning them! It really shows what a mess Disney's feature animation studios were in.

Now, Lilo and Stitch was a really great movie. It was great because it never even tried to be like the classics. It was an experiment... Chris Saunders was given a (relatively) low budget, but also lot more freedom to direct the project personally. The result was a film that was unique, but without being, you know, TOO unique to put Disney off. I really wish Disney did more of this kind of thing -- funding the dream movies of different artists. I am looking forward to Saunders' next project, though.

User avatar
Final_Cosmos_the_Ultra
Douche Bag
Douche Bag
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:03 pm
Location: Here I piss people off.

Post by Final_Cosmos_the_Ultra »

Segaholic2 wrote:Not really. Lilo and Stitch, maybe. Everything else, no.

Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, and The Lion King. It's incredibly sad to see what they are now.
Lilo and Stitch the movie was great, but the series is so crappy. I mean a universe with space travel and maybe magic and the best they can come up with is a poor excuse for a Pokemon wanna be.

User avatar
EmeraldGuardian
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 2:57 pm

Post by EmeraldGuardian »

Atlantis was their last good movie in my opinion.

User avatar
Craig Bayfield
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:28 am
Contact:

Post by Craig Bayfield »

I've not seen Atlantis, it's been on Disney Channel for a long time and I've just never been bothered to watch.

To be honest, besides the Pixar movies, I've not enjoyed Disney's features since the good old days of Beauty and the Beast, Aladin and >.> Kimba the White Lion (The Motion Picture).

Always preferred Don Bleuth's films, because they are entertaining for children, but dark and edgy with mature concepts, which can be suitable for adults aswell as kids (except Fival goes West and the other sequels, which were kiddie crap).

Where the heck is Bleuth anyway? After he makes his first major screw up (Titan A.E) his name hasn't had a thing attached to it. Kids today need another Nimh, or All Dogs. Heck, I'd settle with a Thumbalina or Anastasia (which, though both childish movies marketted at young girls, are oddly entertaining)

Disney should die, already, or submit to just making series. That said, they cancelled Filmore! and okayed American Dragon.

Disney should just sod off and stick to whoring the image at Disney World.

Post Reply