Crowbar wrote:You should know by now that this fanbase is literally impossible to please.
To be more specific, this argument over which design is better is an ouroboros that never goes anywhere.* Having the Sonic fanbase be totally pleased
is impossible and should never be attempted. (Unfortunately, depending on what the hell this game really is, they may be trying to do that with one game.)
The problem this time is, since they just dropped that CG snippet with only a tease of actual information later, they are pretty much daring the argument to start, and thus have, wittingly or not, pit their high-strung fanbase against itself. If they aren't trolling, what're they trying to do, create black holes on the internet?
Speaking of which, let me spell out why this looks like trolling for those who haven't caught it yet:
I can't imagine a scenario where they can't have been aware of the fervor over "green eyes", wherever the hell that spawned from. Logically, if they knew what they were doing, they would have been aware that releasing that teaser would have caused some sort of uproar. So at the least, they didn't care, and at the worst, they timed its' release on purpose to generate the biggest burst of attention they could sustain until the actual reveal - aka, trolling everyone. Now, that's also just marketing doing its' job of course (recklessly), but what qualifies this as vindictive is that whatever attention they create, if in the end it sells enough to profit then they laugh all the way to the bank. And then they start this process up again next game because their customers are this gullible. Further, if these are the same marketing staff who worked on Sonic 4, then they have plenty of experience stringing people along for months.
(*
the franchise is also pretty much spinning its' wheels of late. coincidence?)