Well then

Post by **Delphine** » Fri May 28, 2004 9:51 pm

This board has had over 600 posts in two days. The old board would go days at a time without a new post. I think this one wins, guys.

plasticwingsband · Post by **plasticwingsband** » Fri May 28, 2004 9:53 pm

Sweeeeeeeet.

And now, because everyone can use a bouncing pair of tits.... A Bouncing Pair of Tits!

Post by Bo » Fri May 28, 2004 10:21 pm

Must be the emoticons.

Zeta · Post by **Zeta** » Fri May 28, 2004 10:29 pm

Yeah. I like this a lot better. It's easier to track topics and keep conversations going. Plus, not having to click on another link for every little reply? Big plus.

<-- I don't suppose it would be too much if I asked for a bouncing wang emoticon, would it?

In the meantime, I'll settle for this:

Post by **Delphine** » Fri May 28, 2004 10:32 pm

Zeta wrote:(0)(0) <-- I don't suppose it would be too much if I asked for a bouncing wang emoticon, would it?

I think you, me, and possibly that other chick are the only folks who'd appreciate something like that.

Post by **Green Gibbon!** » Fri May 28, 2004 11:15 pm

NO WANGS

Except mine.

=========)
0

That's roughly to scale.

Zeta · Post by **Zeta** » Fri May 28, 2004 11:21 pm

GG, what happened to the missing testicle?

Ngangbius · Post by **Ngangbius** » Fri May 28, 2004 11:25 pm

Naked boobies, but no bouncing wang emoticons? Boo to double standards.

But yay to the rest of the forum.

Post by **Segaholic2** » Sat May 29, 2004 12:59 am

Actually, it's closer to just under 500, since you forgot about the staff forum. :p

But yeah, 500 posts in two days (and over 70 registered users) is pretty darn impressive. w00t!

Post by **Green Gibbon!** » Sat May 29, 2004 1:59 am

Quit whining! My wang's good enough for the lot of you!

Post by **Segaholic2** » Sat May 29, 2004 2:01 am

But not <I>big</I> enough. Apparently.

Segata · Post by **Segata** » Sat May 29, 2004 9:48 am

8===================|)

That's not a smiley.

Post by **Delphine** » Sat May 29, 2004 1:13 pm

Ngangbius wrote:Naked boobies, but no bouncing wang emoticons? Boo to double standards.

Three of us out of 76 members have voiced an objection to the no-wang rule; majority wins, unfortunately. *shrug* Life blows.

Post by Bo » Sat May 29, 2004 10:26 pm

And what, 74 males to 2 females? Or is it just Del? Or does Del count for two?
...We'd better be nice to her; if she leaves, we're screwed.

Post by **Delphine** » Sat May 29, 2004 10:40 pm

Bo wrote:And what, 74 males to 2 females? Or is it just Del? Or does Del count for two?
...We'd better be nice to her; if she leaves, we're screwed.

Aw, see, y'all should be like Bo, he's cooler than everyone.

Blue Gibbon! · Post by **Blue Gibbon!** » Sun May 30, 2004 9:41 pm

I've been in and out too much to be able to say that I understand the current state of the board, but wasn't there recently (as in within the past year) some kind of stupid "newbies" vs. "veterans" war? I would kind of worry about post counts re-fueling that, but if it's all water under the bridge now, I have no complaints.

Post by **Delphine** » Sun May 30, 2004 10:38 pm

Noobs vs. vets? Wasn't that, like, a year ago, and mostly constituted the second generation getting uppity on the newcomers?

Post by **Squirrelknight** » Sun May 30, 2004 10:44 pm

Bo wrote:And what, 74 males to 2 females?

That sounds like the beginning to a Japanese porno.

Post by **Green Gibbon!** » Mon May 31, 2004 12:13 am

That sounds like the beginning to a Japanese porno.

Bukkake Bistro

God, I hate bukkake.

plasticwingsband · Post by **plasticwingsband** » Mon May 31, 2004 12:18 am

Green Gibbon! wrote:
That sounds like the beginning to a Japanese porno.
Bukkake Bistro

God, I hate bukkake.

"Bukkake" was the first thing that popped into my head when I read Squirrelknight's post.

Post by **Delphine** » Mon May 31, 2004 4:37 pm

I am so very tempted to edit "into" to say "onto", but I won't abuse my privaleges.

plasticwingsband · Post by **plasticwingsband** » Mon May 31, 2004 4:40 pm

Delphine wrote:I am so very tempted to edit "into" to say "onto", but I won't abuse my privaleges.

Ah, thanks. I appreciate that.

Post by **Delphine** » Mon May 31, 2004 4:51 pm

No personal offense meant, of course, I just have a sick sense of humor.

plasticwingsband · Post by **plasticwingsband** » Mon May 31, 2004 4:55 pm

Understood.

Post by **Squirrelknight** » Mon May 31, 2004 8:37 pm

Delphine wrote:I am so very tempted to edit "into" to say "onto", but I won't abuse my privaleges.

Kekekekeke, Del-Chan, you're as witty as you are beautiful and kind.