Page 1 of 2

How big are your balls?

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 5:54 pm
by WhoopA
Image

672m 66.8cm

What, you thought I'd post something gross?

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 5:58 pm
by Protodude
Mine's pretty small, I didn't replay that level much.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 6:00 pm
by Spazz
Mine was like 860<b>+</b>m

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 6:33 pm
by Ngangbius
The largest I managed to roll was about 827m and I rolled everything in the level.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 6:39 pm
by Spazz
Well, some things dissapear once the katamari gets to a certain size, and it also depends on how much stuff fell off.
I've got to double-check anyway, but a friend of mine has it right now. =/

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 9:19 pm
by Cuckooguy
I remember I got the ball to a certain large size (large enough to roll over small trees), and then I was like "Hey, I wonder if I can shake it all off", so I visited the round park with a clock in it so I can crash into everything, and I managed to make the katamari naked, but, even though I shook <i>everything</i> off, it was larger than it's original starting size, and there was an invisible larger sphere for collision detection around the smaller katamari ball, and the Prince is completely unseeable (the Prince model is probably taken off at some point).

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 9:29 pm
by Locit
Spazz wrote:Mine was like 860<b>+</b>m
Ditto.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 9:34 pm
by Delphine
672? <i>That's it?</i> C'mon, man, you gotta try harder than that. My personal best is 864m 3cm 1mm. <a href="http://s9.invisionfree.com/Katamari_Dam ... 79">People have gotten up to 880.</a>

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:15 pm
by WhoopA
Hey, I thought that wasn't bad for the second time I played that level.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:24 pm
by Delphine
You've only played the level twice? Well, it's not that bad, in that case.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 11:56 pm
by Kishi
860 sounds about right.

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:13 pm
by chriscaffee
Decimal points are terrific when combined with the metric system.

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:39 pm
by Omni Hunter
That's because decimal points usually revolve around the metric system.

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 7:43 pm
by Delphine
...

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:01 pm
by chriscaffee
I'm just saying that 672.868m makes a hell of a lot more sense then 672m86cm8mm. I mean why use the metric system if you aren't going to take advantage of the fact that it is a base ten system?

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:44 pm
by Green Gibbon!
It's because in the earlier stages the ball doesn't get that big... your goal in stage 1 is 10cm, for example. In some of the later stages, you start extremely small (in cm) and then gradually expand to meters. You get a clearer idea of your progress by looking at each degree of measurement individually.

So there.

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:47 pm
by Pepperidge
I'm glad that something has finally convinced you people to start using the metric system.

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 11:24 pm
by Locit
I actually just finished a paper on the metric system, and why the traditional American system is inferior in every way. Unfortunately, it is very hard to find the actual plausible reasons we stayed with the inch-pound system, so I literally just finished it, having started at six in the p.m.

Fucking inches... I hate them so much.
But now I hate centimeters too.
That's associative hatred for you.
God I need sleep.

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 11:30 pm
by Green Gibbon!
How about some actual plausible reasons why we still observe daylight savings time?

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 11:39 pm
by Grant
I don't think there are any plausible reasons why we still observe Daylight Savings Time anymore. Generally, people think it's because it helps farmers but from what I've read, they hate it, too.

So, the only real reason is..

Tradition!

Image

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 11:44 pm
by Kishi
I think it's extremely weird that we cock ourselves up so much for the supposed sake of farmers anyway.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:42 am
by G.Silver
I find this a little hard to believe, but apparently it's so that businesses can reduce their operating costs by not having to have their lights on as people work in the dark. It might make sense except that most businesses keep the lights on all day long no matter what it looks like outside.

In one state, Indiana I think, all but one county does not observe daylight savings time for religious reasons, because apparently artificially "changing" the time of day is against god's will. I don't know about any other countries, but they don't have it in Japan either.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:54 am
by Green Gibbon!
I'm pretty sure we're the only nation in the world stupid enough to pretend the earth's rotation speeds up for an hour once every year.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:03 am
by Segaholic2
Too bad DST was invented by a <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Willett">Brit</A>.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 10:17 am
by G.Silver
wikipedia wrote:DST is particularly unpopular among people working in agriculture because the animals do not observe it, and thus the people are placed out of synchronization with the rest of the community, including school times, broadcast schedules, and the like.
Hah, shoulda just gone <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_s ... ">there</a> in the first place.