Page 1 of 1

More Fun With The MPAA: The Great Fanfiction Crackdown

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:32 am
by WB
Yes, they really are crazy out in Hollywood. From today's New York Times:

<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/auth/login?URI=h ... 3AQ2AQ3Aqq)Q2AqQ25Q2AQ5E|Q2AptbC}1bbQ2A41lCQ5DQ2AQ5E|-Q5DQ26C}HbQ5BJQ264F">Really long URL</a>
The Motion Picture Association of America's ratings code - G, PG, PG-13, R and NC-17 - is so familiar that the initials are used in everyday conversation about subjects that have nothing to do with movies. But that doesn't mean that the association wants just anybody to use them.

Recently the association sent e-mail messages and letters to people who write online fan fiction, demanding that they stop tagging stories with the ratings. Fan fiction, which uses characters from popular TV shows, movies and novels in original stories, has used movie ratings for years as a way to help adults find stories with mature content and to steer children away from it. Too many children looking for Harry Potter stories were stumbling onto new and unexpected uses for wands.

"We have a right to go after people who use our trademarks without permission, big or small, whenever we find out about them," said John Feehery, executive vice president for the association. "Our ratings are not supposed to be ripped off."

Wendy Seltzer, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, argues that the association would have a point only if the fiction sites had claimed that association reviewers had rated the works. Using the ratings as a rough comparison is not a trademark infringement, she said: "It's like saying a beverage tastes like Coke."

Heidi Tandy, a lawyer who is also president of fictionalley.org , an archive of Harry Potter fiction, added that ratings such as PG and R are not exclusive to the association, since they are used by some foreign film boards. Movie ratings are also used online to tag jokes and photos, so the association may have a difficult time stripping its ratings from the cultural vocabulary.

Nevertheless, the association's cease-and-desist letters have had a ripple effect, with many fan fiction sites switching to new ratings schemes. One fan fiction writer archly suggested a simple visual code: one bunny picture means no smut, two bunnies means smut ahead.

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:58 am
by chriscaffee
This is pretty ridiculous.

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:20 am
by Double-S-
Stupid NY Times requires registering.

That's incredibly mindboggling, though.

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:42 am
by Delphine
Bugmenot.com, lazyass.

Yeah, I heard about that awhile ago. It's pretty stupid.

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:46 am
by Popcorn
Quick, Del! You'd better change all of your fanfiction!

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:11 am
by Delphine
Just as soon as they email me.

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:33 pm
by Light Speed
Too many children looking for Harry Potter stories were stumbling onto new and unexpected uses for wands.
What?

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:34 pm
by Delphine
Lubricus Buttus.

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:00 pm
by Omni Hunter
Aids constipation and sex life.

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 6:26 pm
by SuperKnux
..and what satisfaction are they getting out of this?

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:57 pm
by Delphine
Who?

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:29 pm
by Zeta
..and what satisfaction are they getting out of this?
The wizard sex advocates?

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:32 am
by -wyvern
The wands?

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:41 pm
by Zeta
Wanna ride my broomstick? ;-)

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:59 pm
by Baba O'Reily
I knew it! Gay guys want me.

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:11 pm
by Zeta
Who said I was talking to you? 6_6

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 5:41 am
by Baba O'Reily
So gay guys don't want me? Damn.

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:09 am
by Omni Hunter
I'll have you Baba...

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 4:31 pm
by Opa-Opa
They did it to Newgrounds.com too...

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 4:51 pm
by Segaholic2
They should just start using the game ratings, then. Screw the MPAA.

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:25 pm
by Baba O'Reily
HAY GUYZ LETS BAN THE USE OF OUR COMONLY RECOGNIZED SYMBOL BECAUSE KIDDIES CAN ASSOCIATE OTHER SIGNS TO AVIOD PORNOGRAPHY LOLOLOL!1!
If you ask a kid on the street above the age of 5 if an R-rating means that they're not supposed to see it, odds are, they can answer with a 'Yes'.

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:38 pm
by Double-S-
Then they'll say "... but I've snuck into them easy."

Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:28 am
by VGJustice
Or "My older brother/sister rented it for me"

Or, worse yet "My parents let me watch it"