Page 1 of 1
I NEED to know how to build one of these!
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:31 pm
by Zeta
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
* 15 January 2005
* From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says.
Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable. Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis", making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians. There was also the idea of making troops' skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight.
The proposals, from the US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, date from 1994. The lab sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals". The plans have been posted online by the Sunshine Project, an organisation that exposes research into chemical and biological weapons.
Spokesman Edward Hammond says it was not known if the proposed $7.5 million, six-year research plan was ever pursued.
Close this window
I have so many questions! How far was this thing developed? Is it hard to build? Could I get a lot of them, say - 365? Buy them in crates or something? In fun-packs?
How large is the range? Where would I use it? Does it come with condoms?
My mind is spinning! This is the GREATEST idea ever!
Oh man!
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:47 pm
by plasticwingsband
Fag.
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:00 am
by Zeta
When my H-Bomb (powerful homosexual explosive) goes off in your backyard - then we'll see who's the fag.
Because it will be YOU.
And me.
But not you and me together.
I have standards.
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:09 am
by chriscaffee
Some of that stuff is pretty cool. But only in the sense of the military applications.
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:17 am
by Grant
Zeta wrote:But not you and me together.
I have standards.
Oh,
burrrrrn.
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:23 am
by plasticwingsband
Zeta wrote:When my H-Bomb (powerful homosexual explosive) goes off in your backyard - then we'll see who's the fag.
Because it will be YOU.
And me.
But not you and me together.
I have standards.
Now that's just hurtful.
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:02 am
by Jaden
Wow, at the start of the 90's being gay wasn't allowed in the Army, but by 94 they were consider it as a weapon... God bless progress...
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:16 am
by Ash Holt
Ahahaha, "TOSS THE GAY GAS GRENADE!"
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:20 am
by Zeta
Now that's just hurtful.
Crying or Very Sad
Aww, c'mere . . . it's OK. I didn't mean it. I would totally do you. Like, totally!
And hey, there are other guys out there. I'm sure one of them would LOVE to make sweet love to you!
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:20 am
by Grant
I wouldn't pass up the opportunity.
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:39 am
by Baba O'Reily
...*Flips a coin*
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:26 am
by Delphine
I love this thread. <3
I'm going to have to agree with plasticwingsbands' initial..
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:36 am
by Knuckles Dawson
...comment on the whole situation, while Chris has some valid points as well. In any case, disabling enemy troops with such an epidemic is an amazing tactic.
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:40 pm
by plasticwingsband
Amazing Grant wrote:I wouldn't pass up the opportunity.
You're damn right you wouldn't, sweetcheeks.
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:58 pm
by Protodude
Wow, this is getting really hot.
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:04 pm
by Spazz
It's working already, Zeta. >_^
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:10 pm
by Double-S-
And it would be a super effective weapon in the Middle East, 'cause they'd all be stoning each other or whatever they do.
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:20 pm
by chriscaffee
I was under the impression that only the female was stoned. So would that be the more feminine one or would they both get off free for having dicks?
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:22 pm
by Baba O'Reily
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:27 pm
by Brazillian Cara
MGS3?
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:58 pm
by Double-S-
No, Super Monkey Ball.
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:09 am
by j-man
OWNED.
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 3:53 pm
by Baba O'Reily
I believe you mean HAND-GESTURE'D.
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 7:35 am
by Neon Chaos
LMAO. Okay, that's just wrong...
