Page 1 of 2
Is that watermelon? OH GOD IT'S NOT WATERMELON.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 3:41 am
by Ash Holt
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 3:42 am
by Segaholic2
Hot.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 4:03 am
by Grant
Yeah, I saw this on another forum.
Couldn't have been fun for the driver. Or the deer.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:34 am
by Delphine
That's gonna be a bitch to clean.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:43 am
by The Doc
You think he had deer insurance?
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:49 am
by Green Gibbon!
I'm no physics major, but I don't think there is any possible way that could've happened.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:04 pm
by The Doc
Actually, it's possible. It's just improbable.
He could have been going in reverse at an insane speed, not noticed the deer. The deer basically explodes, his head flying across the car and through both windshields.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:54 pm
by chriscaffee
Actually it is possible. Even if it involves a chainsaw and a lie, the final outcome is still possible. It's also possible that the car hit it and did that, depending on how the deer was hit and at velocity the car was going. And if AMRs were involved...
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 3:19 pm
by Green Gibbon!
I don't know about you guys, but I sure am hungry for venison.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 3:42 pm
by Light Speed
I am a physics major and I'm still not sure. The end of that deer is cut quite cleanly. I see dead deers on the side of the road all the time out here and they are usually pretty fucked up, ripped and what not. As chris said, it looks like it did involve a chainsaw. Oh and being a physics major has nothing to do with this post by the way.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 4:58 pm
by Segaholic2
You're a physics major? Do you also enjoy being raped anally?
But yeah, the physics you learn in early college classes has very little to do with the physics of vehicle/animal collisions.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:31 pm
by Green Gibbon!
Any biology majors, then?
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:11 pm
by Light Speed
You know damn well I'm a physics major, NT.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:46 pm
by Segaholic2
Yeah, but it's still similar to asking for four years of anal rape.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 7:46 pm
by The Doc
The man speaks the truth.
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 7:54 pm
by Light Speed
I think you are confusing Physics with Math.
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:36 am
by Djbrayster
wow.. so the deer was hit from the front.. going at around 90mph, the deer jumped into the road, the extra height and velocity caused the head and rear to be thrown off the main body by the windshield and glass cutting it.. then the body went through the car and ended making more mess as it left the rear of the car?
simple.. err.. yeah..
only question.. why would they drink Diet Coke with Deer's liver! everyone knows its a glass of red wine!
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:52 am
by The Doc
Or at least a Sam Adams.
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 12:15 pm
by Bo
I'm at an predominantly engineering school, and the general consensus is that the physicists think the real world approximates the equations, the engineers think the equations approximate the real world, and the math majors don't see any connection between the two.
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:19 pm
by Brazillian Cara
It's just a red puddle.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 6:15 am
by Djbrayster
Brazillian Cara wrote:It's just a red puddle.
looks too solid to be a puddle..
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 12:49 pm
by Double-S-
How on earth does the real world approximate equations? Did these physicists come up with the equations before the world existed and then whoever created the universe decided, hey I'll take these equations and make the world revolve around close approximations of 'em!
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 1:46 pm
by Delphine
It was a joke, dude.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 3:24 pm
by Double-S-
But I know physicists who are like that.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 6:09 pm
by j-man
You actually know physicists?
