The GHZ Forum

This board has had over 600 posts in two days. The old board would go days at a time without a new post. I think this one wins, guys.

Sweeeeeeeet.

And now, because everyone can use a bouncing pair of tits.... A Bouncing Pair of Tits!

Must be the emoticons.

Yeah. I like this a lot better. It's easier to track topics and keep conversations going. Plus, not having to click on another link for every little reply? Big plus.


<-- I don't suppose it would be too much if I asked for a bouncing wang emoticon, would it?


In the meantime, I'll settle for this:

Zeta wrote:(0)(0) <-- I don't suppose it would be too much if I asked for a bouncing wang emoticon, would it?

I think you, me, and possibly that other chick are the only folks who'd appreciate something like that.

NO WANGS

Except mine.

=========)
0

That's roughly to scale.

GG, what happened to the missing testicle?

Naked boobies, but no bouncing wang emoticons? Boo to double standards.

But yay to the rest of the forum.

Actually, it's closer to just under 500, since you forgot about the staff forum. :p

But yeah, 500 posts in two days (and over 70 registered users) is pretty darn impressive. w00t!

Quit whining! My wang's good enough for the lot of you!

But not <I>big</I> enough. Apparently.

8===================|)

That's not a smiley.

Ngangbius wrote:Naked boobies, but no bouncing wang emoticons? Boo to double standards.

Three of us out of 76 members have voiced an objection to the no-wang rule; majority wins, unfortunately. *shrug* Life blows.

And what, 74 males to 2 females? Or is it just Del? Or does Del count for two?
...We'd better be nice to her; if she leaves, we're screwed.

Bo wrote:And what, 74 males to 2 females? Or is it just Del? Or does Del count for two?
...We'd better be nice to her; if she leaves, we're screwed.

Aw, see, y'all should be like Bo, he's cooler than everyone.

I've been in and out too much to be able to say that I understand the current state of the board, but wasn't there recently (as in within the past year) some kind of stupid "newbies" vs. "veterans" war? I would kind of worry about post counts re-fueling that, but if it's all water under the bridge now, I have no complaints.

Noobs vs. vets? Wasn't that, like, a year ago, and mostly constituted the second generation getting uppity on the newcomers?

Bo wrote:And what, 74 males to 2 females?

That sounds like the beginning to a Japanese porno.

That sounds like the beginning to a Japanese porno.

Bukkake Bistro


God, I hate bukkake.

Green Gibbon! wrote:

That sounds like the beginning to a Japanese porno.

Bukkake Bistro


God, I hate bukkake.

"Bukkake" was the first thing that popped into my head when I read Squirrelknight's post.

I am so very tempted to edit "into" to say "onto", but I won't abuse my privaleges.

Delphine wrote:I am so very tempted to edit "into" to say "onto", but I won't abuse my privaleges.

Ah, thanks. I appreciate that.

No personal offense meant, of course, I just have a sick sense of humor.

Understood.

Delphine wrote:I am so very tempted to edit "into" to say "onto", but I won't abuse my privaleges.

Kekekekeke, Del-Chan, you're as witty as you are beautiful and kind.