The GHZ Forum

Posted: **Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:45 pm**

I've lost all hope for humanity. First the Underdog movie, and now... this. D:

I just died a little inside. ;_;

Posted: **Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:52 pm**

There is no way. I mean it. I really mean it. No. No way.

Posted: **Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:55 pm**

My childhood is fucking dead.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0952640/

DX

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:01 am**

...

W...

...

You know, I feel really bad for Jason Lee. I really wonder what he's being blackmailed with to star in this.

Also: I like how modernizing the chipmunks for today's "hip" kids means dressing them up as rappers, circa 1991.

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:17 am**

LOOKS PRETTY SWEET SEE YOU THERE OPENING DAY

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:38 am**

PHOTOSHOP

I REFUSE TO BELIEVE ANYTHING ELSE

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:22 am**

Hey, speaking of the Chipmunks, I remember a long time ago when I used to watch the old cartoon I thought the Chipette's Brittany was spelled and pronounced Britainese and I also thought that Britainese was the language they spoke in Britain.

I also remember the old cartoon drove me nuts when I remembered the Chipette's had two conflicting introductory episodes where in both of them it seems they meet Alvin's group for the first time. WHICH EPISODE WAS CANON?!?!?!

Either that or my memory's failing me.

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:23 am**

OK, I don't want to hear anyone bitch about how this movie is "raping their childhood" unless they are 50 years old.

The Chipmunks TV show we all grew up with in the 80s was ALREADY an obnoxious "hip" bastardization of an older cartoon. If this movie is rape then it is raping a rapist. AND WHO DOESN'T LOVE THAT

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 5:38 am**

It would be like Xzibit raping Phil Collins. Fun, but not so much as one would think.

And wasn't that Chipette-Chipmunks thing an episode and the movie (that one in which they compete traveling around the world and such)?

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:21 am**

The chipmunks look really weird without shoes. And they're probably not showing their eyes on purpose until more info on the movie is revealed.

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:40 am**

Those chipmunks are gonna look stupid (AKA beaten up) when they start singing "Witch Doctor" in those clothes.

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 9:02 am**

Black Rook wrote:You know, I feel really bad for Jason Lee. I really wonder what he's being blackmailed with to star in this.

It was probably together with the Underdog contract. His next movie will probably be something along the lines of Super Chicken or Hong Kong Phooey.

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 9:32 am**

Esrever wrote:OK, I don't want to hear anyone bitch about how this movie is "raping their childhood" unless they are 50 years old.

The Chipmunks TV show we all grew up with in the 80s was ALREADY an obnoxious "hip" bastardization of an older cartoon. If this movie is rape then it is raping a rapist. AND WHO DOESN'T LOVE THAT

At least they kept the original designs intact.

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 9:32 am**

Actually, a Super Chicken movie would rock if done right, but we can't bank on that happening, can we?

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:06 pm**

firemario1001 wrote:
Esrever wrote:OK, I don't want to hear anyone bitch about how this movie is "raping their childhood" unless they are 50 years old.

The Chipmunks TV show we all grew up with in the 80s was ALREADY an obnoxious "hip" bastardization of an older cartoon. If this movie is rape then it is raping a rapist. AND WHO DOESN'T LOVE THAT
At least they kept the original designs intact.

You mean these designs here?

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:58 pm**

Rodents shouldn't be gangsta rappers.

PERIOD.

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:41 pm**

Well really, the original cartoon version of the chipmunks were more like this:

Whereas the the 80's redesign looked more like this:

And of course, a big part of that version of the show was dressing them up to match whatever hip modern music they were pastiching:

So like I said, I really don't see how this iteration is any lamer or more offensive than the last one.

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:47 pm**

It's more that this style isn't hip or modern. It's 10 years old.

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:03 pm**

WW wrote:I've lost all hope for humanity. First the Underdog movie, and now... this. D:

I just died a little inside. ;_;

Oh good Lord, there goes the neighborhood.

For real this time.

Posted: **Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:24 pm**

The poster looks like it's from 1990. Seriously, it looks like Home Alone or something. The font, the tagline, what the hell?

Posted: **Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:09 pm**

Popcorn wrote:The font

Thank you. Has that red-on-white bubbly look ever been affixed to a good movie? I mean, the last two to use it were Norbit and that Are We There Yet sequel that did to John C. McGinley what this'll do to Jason Lee.

Posted: **Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:16 pm**

I thought he was referring to the non-logo font...

Posted: **Sat Jul 07, 2007 12:50 am**

DackAttac wrote:Has that red-on-white bubbly look ever been affixed to a good movie?

"BIG".

Posted: **Sun Jul 08, 2007 1:41 am**

He said GOOD movie.

Posted: **Sun Jul 08, 2007 12:22 pm**

Big (assuming we're talking about the 1988 movie) is a good movie. What are you talking about?

The GHZ Forum

Alvin and the Chipmunks... December.

Alvin and the Chipmunks... December.

Re: Alvin and the Chipmunks... December.