WAHOOOOOO!!!!
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 7:39 am
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 8:13 am
Like hell I'm gonna be the first to click on a strange link.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 8:19 am
This is the best thread ever! 
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:11 am
I call bullshit.
Wait, that was a bit of an understatement. Oh well, I don't really feel like driving the point home right now. You don't trust a forum where 95% of the users are unregistered, including the people handing the information out.
Wait, that was a bit of an understatement. Oh well, I don't really feel like driving the point home right now. You don't trust a forum where 95% of the users are unregistered, including the people handing the information out.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:43 am
Yeah, that 3.9 TB disk doesn't sound the least bit made up by a 10 year old.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:10 am
http://engadget.com/2005/10/21/optware- ... rnational/Looshi wrote:Yeah, that 3.9 TB disk doesn't sound the least bit made up by a 10 year old.
http://www.cdfreaks.com/news2.php?ID=12066
http://www.answers.com/topic/holographic-versatile-disc
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:34 am
It's SHINY!
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:35 am
I don't see why we should doubt Rich from the Internet.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:45 am
Yeah, like anyone could trust "AGES YMMAS" regarding information on "SEGA SAMMY".
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:18 pm
I clicked on this thread thinking it was about the Klonoa series. =(
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:28 pm
I was hoping it'd be about Dan Hibiki, but then Dan's more of a YAHOOOOOO!!!! kind of a guy.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:43 pm
Yatta Zeeeeee!
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:02 pm
I am so kicking the shit out of Rich at work tomorrow.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:23 pm
I'll be flabbergasted if games ever even need 1TB of space, nevermind 3.9.
It's pretty amazing people on that forum were actually buying this.
It's pretty amazing people on that forum were actually buying this.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:27 pm
The people's reactions are high comedy.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 5:42 pm
That is the most clever thing I have ever heard in my life.Kishi wrote:I was hoping it'd be about Dan Hibiki, but then Dan's more of a YAHOOOOOO!!!! kind of a guy.
Which scares me...
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 6:06 pm
Nobody will ever need more than 640k RAM.James McGeachie wrote:I'll be flabbergasted if games ever even need 1TB of space, nevermind 3.9.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:10 pm
Dan is the best character of any game series ever.Kishi wrote:I was hoping it'd be about Dan Hibiki, but then Dan's more of a YAHOOOOOO!!!! kind of a guy.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:55 pm
HVD technology is real. Smaller capacity disks are going to be ready as early as this year, but they're going to be ridiculously expensive.
I'm hoping that the technology can catch on quickly, to the point where it can be adapted by home consumers in 4-5 years. Since we all know that this HD-DVD/Blu-Ray bullshit isn't going to go anywhere.
I'm hoping that the technology can catch on quickly, to the point where it can be adapted by home consumers in 4-5 years. Since we all know that this HD-DVD/Blu-Ray bullshit isn't going to go anywhere.
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:46 pm
3.9 TB? Christ, that is too much. And here I was thinking that a 256-bit console was too much...which makes me wonder, how much more advanced can games realistically get?
Heh heh, I never thought I'd see a forum where the members are actually more annoying than I am.
Heh heh, I never thought I'd see a forum where the members are actually more annoying than I am.
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:53 pm
I believe the global market capacity for personal computers exceeded five years ago.James McGeachie wrote:I'll be flabbergasted if games ever even need 1TB of space, nevermind 3.9.
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 2:14 pm
What console is 256 bits?
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 2:24 pm
X-Box 360, PS3...or am I assuming things I shouldn't?
Again?
(Based on the knowledge that GameCube, PS2, and Dreamcast were 128-bit)
Again?
(Based on the knowledge that GameCube, PS2, and Dreamcast were 128-bit)
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:56 pm
It may sound like a lot, but in terms of storing video, it translates to only a few hours of uncompressed high-definition content.jenkins wrote:3.9 TB? Christ, that is too much. And here I was thinking that a 256-bit console was too much...which makes me wonder, how much more advanced can games realistically get?
Heh heh, I never thought I'd see a forum where the members are actually more annoying than I am.
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:04 pm
Why would anyone want to store video uncompressed?