Page 1 of 2

Sonic Locations South Island to StationSquare based on real?

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:45 am
by SonicEXE
In the early games they seem to be in the south pacific, South Island is the name of a real island and Sonic was supposedly born on Christmas Island (Also a real island) it is clear that Station Square is based on Southern California as well or even more so are the levels in Sonic Adventure 2 set in a San Francisco like city and the bridges which seem to be based on the Golden Gate bridge. In SA2 they had Egyptian like Pyramids closely to the San Francisco like city but you could argue that?s because they wanted to put levels like that in there.

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:39 am
by Ancient
Since when was Sonic born on Christmas island? Did I miss something?

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:50 am
by j-man
I think it was some old story in the 10th Anniversary booklet or something. It's right on my shelf but I can't be bothered to get it. Anyone else?

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:56 am
by chriscaffee
Mentioned in the Sonic Technical Files translated by STI.

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:07 am
by j-man
Topher Saves The Day.

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:39 pm
by muke
Told you he was American, j-man. Not only did the planning team (despite being Japanese, but that's the only exception in my equation) finally come up with Sonic in San Francisco, but the most important landmarks in the series are also based around there!

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:09 pm
by Frieza2000
South Island and Christmas Island are based around Australia, not America. And the fact that the creators are Japanese actually helps your argument somewhat, considering Japan's fascination with the west. Half of what Sonic says on the Japanese voice tracks is abused English.

Re: Sonic Locations South Island to StationSquare based on r

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:29 pm
by Ecco
SonicEXE wrote: it is clear that Station Square is based on Southern California
Funny. I always thought that Station Square was modelled after Tokyo, just because, you know, that city seems to be a place that giant monsters are naturally attracted to.

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:38 pm
by muke
But Frieza, I always thought that there was a south island just a little bit away from the Bay bridge (however I can't argue with Christmas Island). Also, SA2's "Station Square" (i.e. City Escape) is more based off of San Francisco because of all the hills and the trolley cars, it's what the city is known for. I had family who lived there for awhile and the hills were so bad that they had to leave their '67 Mustang behind when they moved there because it was a stick shift.

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:44 pm
by j-man
muke wrote:Told you he was American, j-man.
When did we have a dispute over it?

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:51 pm
by muke
Awhile ago in a topic I can't remember off hand. I said something like "[Sonic was made]...In America, For Americans" and you responded with "LIES" or something of the like.

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:57 pm
by j-man
Yeah, that sounds like something I'd say. I won't bother going off on another unnecessary diatribe, though; I'll let our resident pedants crawl out of the woodwork and do all the ranting about cannons and suchlike.

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:27 pm
by Zeta
YOU ALL SUCK! SONIC IS FRENCH!

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:06 pm
by Ancient
But Sonic doesn't lose every war he participates in?

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:38 pm
by Gwilym
HAHA OOH BOY DIDN'T SEE THAT ONE COMING

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:30 am
by Ancient
What? Don't tell me you're French too?

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:35 am
by Gwilym
No, I'm not French - but considering that you're an American, doesn't that make you an obese, gun toting imbecile without any cultural education at all? No, it doesn't.

Summed up: You're a fucking idiot.

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:16 am
by Double-S-
Somebody's sensitive.

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:28 am
by Gwilym
Imagine a newsreader's tone of voice when reading it. I'm not sensitive, I just dislike lazy thinking.

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:43 am
by j-man
Who was it who won the two World Wars again? Oh yeah, the Allied forces. I'm sure there was a couple French guys in there. Maybe a couple fucking thousand.

Seriously, why is it that (almost) every American smugly claims that the French "always lose their wars" or whatever? Is it like some massive plague of ignorance passed down through generations? Is it something in the water? Someone help me, here.

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:07 am
by Popcorn
Those French were getting pissed on!! We had to save their sorry frog-eating arses!

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:17 am
by j-man
WE ALL WON IT TOGETHER OK

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:17 pm
by chriscaffee
The only thing good to come from France is the FAMAS.
gun toting
It's so fun.



Image

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:38 pm
by Esrever
The French couldn't even win the war in Vietnam! How embarassing is that?

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:42 pm
by chriscaffee
However, the reason the U.S. didn't win was due to politics and moral of the people. Our military had the capability, but not the blessing.