Capcom vs Namco

[Double-S-]

Hey, wasn't there an announcement made a while back regarding some kind of Capcom / Sammy / SNK crossover? Or something? What am I thinking of?

I dunno, the closest you're going to get to a threesome?

Ba-ZING!

[Esrever]

That was cold, man. Ice cold.

[Zeta]

Not really. How many of us are ever going to have chance at a threesome? I mean, really . . .

And no, Baba - having sex with two geese at the same time does not constitute a threesome.

[Baba O'Reily]

That's zoophilia. Homie don't play that.

[Team Mecha]

I can't see the 2nd & 3rd images.

Now, seriously - when are we going to get a Capcom vs Nintendo version of Super Smash Brothers? It's bound to happen at this rate. Especially since Capcom and Nintendo have been collaborating over the past couple of years.

And Naka is putting Sonic on the table for the next SM, too. So as ridiculous as its sounds with things as they are - a Capcom vs. Nintendo vs. Sega All Stars version of Smash Brothers is not that impossible . . .

Why not Capcom vs. Nintendo vs. Sega vs. Namco? Afterall, Namco was been going overboard with using Nintendo's characters lately.

[chriscaffee]

You keep throwing an extra 'o' in there. You do know the prefix is "zo" right?

[Esrever]

Not really. How many of us are ever going to have chance at a threesome? I mean, really . . .

Hmmm.... no, that one would be too easy.

[chriscaffee]

Plus, her boobies provide leverage that makes up for her lack of foot space.

Yeah, in the wrong direction. Her breasts are above her center of mass.

What if she had artificial gravity generators in her feet?

The only artificial gravity I'm aware of is called "inertia" and it comes from a space station spinning. Of course that makes no real sense in this case. Even if one could create AGGs in her feet where would the room for the muscular, skeletal and nervous tissue be? We are already dealing with anime-girl proportions which don't even work for all the real-life systems that are stored in the human body. Her only hope is to wear cement shoes and pray that her ankles don't break.

You would think a more effective weapon would be something like a .40-.50 caliber rifle with match-grade ammunition and lot's of it. She could easily deal with the recoil of firing it from the shoulder with her robot-strength (yet it wouldn't be over the top since a normal person could do it as well - just feels like a bitch doing it over and over) the rifle would be accurate and able to penetrate thicker armor then a normal .30 caliber round.

Of course if each shot hit the same mark the .30s could sort of punch their way through eventually. However, even with advanced targeting systems, the latent inaccuracies in an automatic weapon would make it impossible.

The design isn't without it's merits though. With a multiple set of Gatling barrels, one can have continuous fire without overheating. You simply fire one set of barrels for a burst then switch to the next and the next. The only thing is, it's not any better then just mounting three seperate miniguns which would be cheaper, less bulky and would have the advantage of being able to be aimed in several different directions at once. Of course I'm thinking of them being mounted on a gunship.

One last note. The barrels are too long. It's just excessive weight really.

-
-
-
-
-
-

And nobody read any of that.

[Double-S-]

Isn't she a robot?

[chriscaffee]

Yeah, but she still only weighs 184 pounds.

[Double-S-]

So maybe she has enough super robot technology to have enough torque in her arms to control the guns.

[chriscaffee]

She still doesn't weight enough to stand up while doing it.

Weren't you the one that said nobody cares about video games having bad physics?

[Double-S-]

Yes. It's called "suspension of disbelief". You should try it some time. Or just come up with some ridiculous answer to satisfy yourself.

For example, maybe she also has super robot technology anchors in her feet.

[chriscaffee]

I did that once. It was in MechWarrior 3. The lasers were correct. The missiles had a minimum flight distance needed to arm. Your 'Mech could fall down if it was hit in the gyro or in the legs, or by a very powerful weapon. Really the only thing that wasn't right was the ranges of all the weapons and perhaps the damage values. I was able to forgive those.

Generally I don't "suspend my disbelief." I say "That's cool, but it could never happen."

[Segaholic2]

Physics, as with all other sciences, is a fallible attempt at an explanation for the endlessly amazing and intricate world around us.

So shut up already about unrealistic physics. Unless you're God and can give us the exact equations for everything instead of the ones that some smart people derived (and are continually being revised and updated as new research turns up).

Also, you're arguing about stuff from works of fiction. Get a life.

[Delphine]

Also, you're arguing about stuff from works of fiction. Get a life.

*cough*

[Esrever]

ICE COLD!

[chriscaffee]

So let me get your argument right:

Because I can't possibly know everything there is to know about physics, I can't make any judgment whatsoever on whether something is possible or not. I couldn't deny such claims as babies lifting up dump trucks or the sun not rising on tuesdays. I suppose I also can't argue history because God knows I don't know everything about that, just the fallible research done by smart people.

Wait. I guess I can't even talk about guns because while I know a hell of lot more about them then anyone on this forum I am also quite ignorant on that subject as well. I guess unless I am the allknowing God himself, I am not allowed to talk.

Also if the work in question is fiction no discussion can be made. Might as well throw all debates and critiques about the great works of literature down the trash because they are all arguments about works of fiction. Anyone who does that doesn't have a life. Whatever "a life" is. What the hell does "get a life" mean anyway? Sounds to me like something a lazy person says who wants to throw a verbal punch but lacks the wit to say something that makes sense.

[Double-S-]

If the work in question has no attempts to be realistic, then there are no grounds for complaining about the lack of realism.

"Get a life" means do something productive with it.

[Delphine]

the sun not rising on tuesdays.

No, you've got it wrong. The sun doesn't rise on <i>Mondays</i>. It's late on Tuesdays, but it does show up.

[chriscaffee]

"Get a life" means do something productive with it.

The GHZ Forum
Just sitting here wasting our precious time.

[Segaholic2]

You're arguing about something completely irrelevant to the discussion. If you want to argue about how imbalanced the characters in Xenosaga are, or if you didn't like a plot twist, then sure, whatever. But you're arguing about <I>unrealistic</I> physics in a game with robot warriors set in outer space or something (I dunno, I haven't played it).

This proves to me that 1) you're a jackass, or 2) (more likely) you are a consummate idiot.

You like guns. Cool, whatever. That doesn't mean you have to argue about every single unrealistic representation of a gun in every game ever. OH MAN, MARIO BUSTS BLOCKS WITH HIS HEAD, YOU CAN'T DO THAT IN REAL LIFE.

To summarize: chriscaffee, you are an idiot and I don't like you. If I see any more of your bullshit pissing about unrealistic physics or guns, I'm deleting the post. I believe I've been pretty tolerant of it so far, but you're getting ridiculous.

[Green Gibbon!]

Seriously guys, loosen up. The dude's just fucking around. We like to do that here.

[Delphine]

Actually Holic, you're the one getting ridiculous. I'll be the first to admit that Caffee isn't my favorite person, but he's just shootin the shit. Not that big of a deal.

[Segaholic2]

How am I being ridiculous? I really haven't said anything about it other than one post that said something like "don't post guns randomly for no reason". His posts about unrealistic physics in everything amounts to nothing more than trolling and it's beginning to bug me.