This is true. However, I hope that someone who's been living with a STD all their life would be responsible enough to use a condom.j-man wrote:Some unfortunate people can be born with STDs, you know.
Stay tuned for an important message!
Yanno, all of my health classes have said that homosexuality is the most dangerous (going so far as to cover lesbians)... but then I remembered that I'm in Alabama, which just so happens to be a Bible Belt state! Boy, I sure am stupid to forget about how much the Christians affect the schools around here...Crazy Penguin wrote:Well, it's not like sexuality is a choice, or that straight couples don't do anal too. Lesbian sex is the safest anyway.aso wrote:Years of Health classes have really started to kill me with worry concerning any and everything involving sex, and it seems homosexuality is about the very worst to even consider.
And as far as condoms go, they aren't always 100% reliable, yadda yadda yadda, only sure way is to cut off sperm, yada yada, even a small risk with that, etc etc.
- Delphine
- Horrid, Pmpous Wench
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:05 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
I'm surprised you talk about <i>sex</i> in this health class of yours. Or condoms. Did you know the Vatican tells people NOT to use condoms because they don't work? Funny people, Catholics.aso wrote:Yanno, all of my health classes have said that homosexuality is the most dangerous (going so far as to cover lesbians)... but then I remembered that I'm in Alabama, which just so happens to be a Bible Belt state! Boy, I sure am stupid to forget about how much the Christians affect the schools around here...
As far as STDs go, having anal sex does put you more at risk because there's a greater risk of bleeding and therefore a greater risk of semen and blood mixing etc. etc. That doesn't mean that <b>simply being gay</b> puts you at a greater risk of contracting STDs. Please stop saying that, it's annoying. AIDS is NOT the gay disease. I thought we got over this in the 90's.
- Segaholic2
- Forum God
- Posts: 3516
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:28 am
Considering I'm gay myself, I just wanted to hear another side of the issue... never hurts to get a bit of reassurance from another source. I do understand, very much so, that AIDS is by no means a strictly gay disease! I'm sorry if you thought I was implying that.Delphine wrote:I'm surprised you talk about <i>sex</i> in this health class of yours. Or condoms. Did you know the Vatican tells people NOT to use condoms because they don't work? Funny people, Catholics.aso wrote:Yanno, all of my health classes have said that homosexuality is the most dangerous (going so far as to cover lesbians)... but then I remembered that I'm in Alabama, which just so happens to be a Bible Belt state! Boy, I sure am stupid to forget about how much the Christians affect the schools around here...
As far as STDs go, having anal sex does put you more at risk because there's a greater risk of bleeding and therefore a greater risk of semen and blood mixing etc. etc. That doesn't mean that <b>simply being gay</b> puts you at a greater risk of contracting STDs. Please stop saying that, it's annoying. AIDS is NOT the gay disease. I thought we got over this in the 90's.
- Delphine
- Horrid, Pmpous Wench
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:05 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
Sorry, didn't mean to be snappish. :\ You'd be surprised how many people say things like that to me, knowing I'm nostraight and therefore not amused. I think they do it on purpose.aso wrote:Considering I'm gay myself, I just wanted to hear another side of the issue... never hurts to get a bit of reassurance from another source. I do understand, very much so, that AIDS is by no means a strictly gay disease! I'm sorry if you thought I was implying that.
Meh! Don't worry about it. This same sort of issue has led to many, similar arguments with my stepfather. I'm still closeted, to boot, so it equals humor for people who aren't me!Delphine wrote:Sorry, didn't mean to be snappish. :\ You'd be surprised how many people say things like that to me, knowing I'm nostraight and therefore not amused. I think they do it on purpose.aso wrote:Considering I'm gay myself, I just wanted to hear another side of the issue... never hurts to get a bit of reassurance from another source. I do understand, very much so, that AIDS is by no means a strictly gay disease! I'm sorry if you thought I was implying that.
I still remember the 'guest' in my last Health-related class explaining how each and every form of homosexual sex is mroe dangerous than the equivalent form of heterosexual sex, and how.
They did add on, in an afterthought, "Oh, and heterosexual sex is sort of dangerous, too. Just not as much". Thanks, guys.
And I'm male. I love how the question comes up on most any forum I go to.
They did add on, in an afterthought, "Oh, and heterosexual sex is sort of dangerous, too. Just not as much". Thanks, guys.
And I'm male. I love how the question comes up on most any forum I go to.
Sadly, it's not much better where I live. It goes without saying that that is complete and utter nonsense.
Being homosexual yourself, I would assume that you would have been doing a lot of research on the subject before really identifying as homosexual, so I'm a little perplexed that you would still need to hear other viewpoints.
Being homosexual yourself, I would assume that you would have been doing a lot of research on the subject before really identifying as homosexual, so I'm a little perplexed that you would still need to hear other viewpoints.
The reasoning is that there's not nearly enough people in this world. God wants us to keep on reproducing till we all turn into cannibals. This is also the reason homosexuals are evil. They're not busy reproducing and creating more children to eat food we don't have. Catholics REALLY don't understand the concept of overpopulation at ALL.I thought Catholics don't use condoms because contraceptives are from Satan.
Stereotype. Catholics don't believe homosexuality is wrong, just sexual homosexual acts. Though I'm a Catholic, I really don't care what the church says about homosexuality. It's really none of their damn business. The Catholic church really butts into peoples' personal life a little too much.Zeta wrote:This is also the reason homosexuals are evil. They're not busy reproducing and creating more children to eat food we don't have.
Nah, just people like the Church Lady believe that.Segaholic2 wrote:I thought Catholics don't use condoms because <I>contraceptives are from Satan</I>.
Last edited by Spazz on Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Crazy Penguin
- Drano Master
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 10:06 pm
You mean plain Corn Flakes... And only those served at Battle Creek Sanatarium ran by Dr. John Harvey Kellogg... A comedic telling of it can be seen in the Road to Wellville, which can be caught on Comedy Central from time to time...The Doc wrote:Yeah. I mean, Frosted Flakes were originally made with a special ingredient that caused a decrease in erection. In essence, Tony the Tiger was created to prevent us all from whackin' it.
*grabs a torch and pitchfork*
I still say we kill 'im.
- Baba O'Reily
- ABBA BANNED
- Posts: 3339
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:26 pm
- Location: http://zenixstudios.com/files/ 554SpaceIsThePlace.Mp3
- Contact:
Well maybe he will with the litlle yellow bird....Zeta wrote:Thanks, J-man.
Lucy with a strap-on, obviously. If Chuck was sleeping with Linus, methinks the blankie-lovin' kid would be on bottom.Now, I have a book deal in the works, it's called, "You Just Got Anally Raped, Charlie Brown!" Any ideas?
And while Peppermint Patty obviously has a thing for Mr. Brown, everyone knows that Marcy will one day win her over into a lifetime of lesbian bliss.
All the other Peanuts characters suck, so don't includ them. Well, except for Snoopy. But Snoopy would never sleep with Charlie Brown.
The dog has standards.
Last edited by Nova on Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.