Neo wrote:Hypocrisy alert!
..Hm? In what way was I being a hypocrite? I was just pointing out that the original Smash Bros featured bad graphics, repetitive gameplay, and overall, lacked any real substance. Sequels featured improved graphics, but the gameplay pretty much remained the same. Its only selling hook is the large roster of Nintendo characters. Without them, nobody would give a shit about this game series.
But since I don't like it, I guess that means I'm a Sega fanboy and thus my opinion is worthless. I can't just.. you know,
not like the game. There's got to be some ulterior motive.
Neo wrote:Holy shit.
I didn't actually ignore you before, but from now on I'm going to actively skip over each and every one of your posts. Jesus Christ.
Radrappy wrote:I never thought I'd see smash brothers compared to soul caliber as if they were remotely similar games.
They are both part of the "Fighting game" genre.