The joke is that when the rebels in Libya suddenly broke into government arms depots, drove around firing their machine guns in the air, and began their war against the country, Western media and leaders stylised the armed insurgency as “peaceful, democratic protests” (which never took place—the rebels took up arms right away) and titled the rebellion a “popular revolt” (in defiance of the fact that the rebels are a chaotic, unstable coalition of various interest groups ranging from Senoussi loyalists over Islamists to feuding clans). Then, on the basis of completely unverified claims, they accused Ghaddafi of “waging war against his own people”, claimed that he had lost all legitimacy, and rushed to the UN to legitimise an intervention in the rebellion to install a puppet regime (representatives of the rebels have already met with Western oil companies several times to negotiate how Libya's resources will be split up after the civil war). Which, thus far, is failing horribly, because the “Freedom Fighters” are a disorganised bunch of rabble (not unlike the British looters, just more destructive), not even able to capitalise on the NATO bombing the entire Libyan war machinery in to the ground, and even less able to lead a country.Crowbar wrote:What violent repression and what peaceful demonstrations?
Unless I've missed something big, the main issue is that the police can't/aren't doing much about the violent riots.
Or am I missing some more irony here?
Now Ghaddafi's representative here was being sarcastic by using the same exact wordings and making the same demands Britain threw at the Libyan government at the beginning of the rebellion on the UK in order to highlight the absurdity of its actions in Libya. Which is utterly hilarious.